Status — Streaming Music and royalties increase…
Spotify
Loading...
Verify on BlockchainSpotify
Why should creators be concerned about Spotify’s long-term growth?
Shouldn’t the focus be on how much money they get for each play than how many users Spotify is losing to the competition (churn)? *
*Spotify does not reveal its current churn rate, but Citi analyst Jason Bazinet estimates it was about 4% in 2020, down from 7.7% in 2015, according to one of the company’s financial filings.
The average revenue per user (ARPU) has a direct relationship to royalties’ payments, which should be higher. In 2020, Spotify’s global ARPU was $5.25 a month, of which it paid out about $3.90 a month to rights holders.
That number is down 39.4% since 2015, when it was $8.66. When Spotify makes less per user, of course, so do creators.
Creators basically is funding the business strategy of Spotify, which is growth above all else. To be fair they are not making any money, YET!
Higher ARPU means higher royalties, while Spotify’s priority involves more subscribers staying with the service longer.
The recent increase in Spotify’s subscription plans will likely mean a little more royalties coming to creators.
The question is, will it be enough?
China’s music business
China’s music business is slowly moving away from piracy and into licensed streaming.
Over the past five years, China’s recorded-music business has grown at an unparalleled pace: up 278% from $209.4 million in 2016 to $791.9 million in 2020, according to IFPI, with streaming accounting for 90.5% of last year’s revenue.
Tencent Music Entertainment’s (TME) three platforms — QQ, Kuguo and Kuwo — controlled 77% of China’s monthly active users, according to QuestMobile, a Chinese research company.
However, after in the past two years, Universal Music Group (UMG), Sony Music and Warner Music Group (WMG) have decided to diversify their distribution and leverage intensifying competition for better deals offered by companies like NetEase Cloud Music. This creates churn for TME.
When my company The24Music (together with Artspages) was in China in 2006 (separate story) more than 99% of music downloads in China were pirated, according to IFPI. But in 2011 China punished leading search engine Baidu for providing illegal mp3 downloads and things got better.
According to the Global Music Industry Report, the world’s second-largest economy only entered the world’s top ten music markets for the first time in 2017. The Chinese digital music market growing in size from RMB 4.7 billion (605 million Euro) in 2017, according to iResearch, to a forecasted RMB 20.6 billion (2.6 billion Euro) in 2021.
Back in 2006 there was no way we could get any royalties out of China (and when I found I way I was kicked out). Today, it is possible.
However, it takes time and cost (a lot) in fees along the way.
Status!
“ The industry has taken a big hit and is down around 30 percent on last year [2020].
The pandemic has been especially hard on songwriters and artists. Pre-COVID, streaming was a way for artists to promote their live shows. Now, they’re in the same situation as songwriters and are finding it difficult to earn a living. COVID has really focused attention on the unsustainability of the music industry ecosystem. It is just not working for artists and songwriters and it has to work for all the players. […] The old CMO and music industry world will have to get used to the openness and transparency that technology enables. That’s where they made their money.
That is the future. The transformation is gradual, but it is happening.”
(Björn Ulvaeus — CISAC President / ABBA)
I did have a 2 hour Zoom with Björn Ulvaeus earlier this year and he is kept in the loop on our progress…
A user-centric alternative royalty payments is likely to take some time if we are to fully rely on major DSP changing their business model.
However, they are open to discuss “user centric”.
I think you all know what NIM can do: More money, faster — to copyright owners…
NIM are able to provide creators with up to 60% more in royalties and (average) 26 million times faster.
Especially out of China…
Originally published at https://newinternetmedianews.com on June 4, 2021.
Evidence
| Article | Status — Streaming Music and royalties increase… (CCN0009) |
|---|---|
| Archived from | Moved here from news.copyrightchains.com (original address), first published there 2021-06-04 05:57:45 UTC |
| Registered on CopyrightChains | Original CopyrightID 0x527afeb9ae97c80bf2366fd13f4d96c0db1c03450f092a65bb44eaa7a9690e10 (explorer), registered on news.copyrightchains.com 2025-12-30 11:53:31 UTC. It keeps that CopyrightID and was not registered again here. |
| Registered text hash | SHA-256 0x160a55c137352002d4f185e49add86af1f84f73ed129ded122e57cf62972428c |
| Snapshot of this copy | SHA-256 390420911f119bd0893305ba552db4bef30817acfbbe2f4605f910f5a62e906d · snapshot · OpenTimestamps proof |
| This copy existed by Bitcoin block | 975195 (2026-11-09 16:38:44 UTC). A new Bitcoin proof made when the article moved here: it dates this copy, not when the article was written. |
| Archive record | SHA-256 c1ae5bd97432e972dceebba4e7df85e85dff85c72c98849626518832a923d3e5 · record · OpenTimestamps proof |
| Archive record existed by Bitcoin block | 975195 (2026-11-09 16:38:44 UTC) |
| Check it yourself | verification API · all versions |
This shows that this copy of an article moved from news.copyrightchains.com existed in this exact form by the Bitcoin blocks given, and which CopyrightID registered the original there. The Bitcoin blocks date this copy, not the writing or the original registration: the CopyrightID transaction dates the registration. It does not establish that the article is true, who wrote it, or who owns it. CopyrightChains is a permissioned registry operated by the publisher; independent time evidence comes from the Bitcoin anchor.