{"archive":{"archived_from":"news.copyrightchains.com","copyright_id":"0xf39f6572d24cae7889088d5a227ec8f9a14a82819d593a7b4e362ca46e328349","original_content_hash":"0xf46e65e037f5e5fcc1228ea9f27e499e08d1932fff2f64cbbb37841ea37a38e6","original_plaintext":"NIM has gone beyond merely discussing the problem to actively measuring it by building a fraud-detection engine to analyze it. The data generated offers a clear picture of the scale of the problem.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDue to the sensitive nature of our detection algorithms, access to the fraud detection dashboard is limited (fraud.copyrightchains.com)\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAsk for access\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCritical risk identification across the ecosystem\n\nThe system examined 575,051 entities, including tracks, playlists, artists, albums, and playlist owners. Seven fraud detection algorithms were applied simultaneously to this data, producing a risk score ranging from 0 to 100 for each entity.\n\nThe analysis identified 22,530 entities with scores of 80 or above, marking them as critical risk. These high scores reflect strong, multi-signal evidence of fraudulent activity rather than minor anomalies. An additional 155,219 entities scored between 60 and 79, classifying them as high risk needing further investigation. The data show that roughly one in three entities in the analyzed set exhibit significant indicators of fraud.\n\n\nThe mechanics of modern streaming fraud\n\nFraud strategies have become more advanced, involving complex, multi-layered techniques that go far beyond basic bot attacks.\n\n * Playlist farms operate as networks of bot-curated playlists. A single operator creates playlists, generating millions of artificial streams, funneling royalties to specific tracks under their control.\n * Track stuffing involves flooding the platform with short, auto-generated content. Fraudsters upload thousands of tracks just over the 30-second royalty threshold and utilize bot networks to stream them continuously.\n * Coordinated networks consist of account clusters behaving with suspicious synchronization, such as following identical playlists or streaming the same tracks simultaneously.\n * Fake catalogs appear as complete artist profiles but exist solely to capture revenue, often utilizing AI-generated audio or repurposed ambient noise.\n\n\nMulti-dimensional pattern detection\n\nEffective detection requires recognizing these patterns together, since fraud is rarely one-sided. Operators of playlist farms often exhibit temporal anomalies, such as streaming at unusual hours, along with coordinated network activity and metadata inconsistencies.\n\nThe CopyrightChains platform utilizes seven specific detection algorithms:\n\n 1. Playlist farm detection: Identifies networks of bot-curated playlists.\n 2. Track stuffing analysis: Flags artificially inflated catalogs.\n 3. Coordinated network detection: Locates accounts operating in concert.\n 4. Fake catalog identification: Detects fabricated artist profiles.\n 5. Royalty farming detection: Uncovers systematic royalty manipulation.\n 6. Temporal anomaly analysis: Identifies unnatural streaming time patterns.\n 7. Label and copyright gap detection: Locates inconsistencies in metadata.\n\nIn addition, we have identified 5 other less common detection algorithms that we will not disclose, as they underpin an increasingly sophisticated setup and are directly related to our work on creating a more AI- and search-friendly architecture.\n\nA composite score synthesizes these findings. While a single flag may represent a coincidence, multiple concurrent flags provide a definitive signal of fraudulent activity.\n\n\nOperationalizing fraud intelligence\n\nData requires accessibility to drive action.\n\nThe CopyrightChains analyst dashboard offers live, interactive access to real-time data, allowing investigators to filter 575,000 entities by risk level, pattern, and type. The system enables drilling down into specific evidence for each score, marking false positives to improve institutional knowledge, and monitoring score changes over time. Authorized stakeholders access this intelligence through a role-based security system.\n\n\nEconomic impact and future deployment\n\nFraudulent streams directly drain the limited royalty pool, reducing payments to legitimate rights holders. Independent and mid-tier creators, who lack the resources to fight systemic abuse, suffer the most financial damage. By detecting fraud at scale, the platform guarantees royalties go to the content creators who earned them.\n\nFuture development will broaden the system beyond the initial scope to include more streaming platforms, shift from batch analysis to real-time monitoring, and integrate with modern rights management systems.\n\nThis initial step in building a comprehensive transparency infrastructure is a core issue for our partners.\n\n\nTechnical architecture (public)\n\nThe platform applies seven distinct detection algorithms simultaneously across the streaming data graph.\n\n\n\nDetection patternTarget activityPlaylist farmBot-curated playlist networksTrack stuffingArtificially inflated catalogsCoordinated networkMulti-account fraud ringsFake catalogFabricated artist/album profilesRoyalty farmingSystematic royalty manipulationTemporal anomalyUnnatural streaming time patternsLabel and copyright gapMetadata inconsistencies signaling fraud\n\n\n\nThe system assigns a composite fraud score to each entity, ranging from 0 to 100, by synthesizing signals from all applicable patterns. This allows analysts to review the specific evidentiary data supporting each score.\n\n\nCurrent detection metrics\n\nAs of February 2026, the platform has generated the following analysis:\n\n\n\nMetricValueTotal entities flagged575,051Critical risk (score 80+)22,530High risk (score 60–79)155,219Detection patterns running7Entity types analyzed5\n\n\n\n\nBreakdown by entity type:\n\n\n\nEntity typeCountTracks328,676Albums134,846Playlists72,321Artists33,682Playlist owners5,526\n\n\n\nThe data confirms that fraud permeates the entire ecosystem, affecting individual tracks, albums, and the playlist owners distributing them.","original_published_at":"2026-02-11T06:25:25.000Z","original_url":"https://news.copyrightchains.com/the-silence-that-pays-better-than-a-song-analysis-of-playlists-reveals-the-scale-of-streaming-fraud/","registry_address":"0x979F1e9ba67A593B5424c3cEAD08f9B8060BD524","series_llc_number":201,"signer":"0xb2591EBEF0B1A12B83424D9FA36B28914588599B","text_matches_registration":true},"authors":["Thor Pettersen"],"canonicalization":"pp-news-v1","content_fingerprint":"ddf40ba0e5028970299b2e2aea88471abad86fb975dffe15a695d80adf4e8997","custom_excerpt":"Streaming fraud has long been a known issue in the music industry. While many recognize the presence of artificial streaming, precise measurement is rare, and effective solutions are even rarer. ","feature_image":"https://news.proofprofile.it/content/images/2026/02/fraud-2.jpg","feature_image_caption":null,"ghost_version":"6.72","html":"

NIM has gone beyond merely discussing the problem to actively measuring it by building a fraud-detection engine to analyze it. The data generated offers a clear picture of the scale of the problem.

\n \n
\n \n \n
\n \n
\n

Due to the sensitive nature of our detection algorithms, access to the fraud detection dashboard is limited (fraud.copyrightchains.com)

\n
\n \n \n \n Ask for access\n \n \n
\n \n
\n

Critical risk identification across the ecosystem

The system examined 575,051 entities, including tracks, playlists, artists, albums, and playlist owners. Seven fraud detection algorithms were applied simultaneously to this data, producing a risk score ranging from 0 to 100 for each entity.

The analysis identified 22,530 entities with scores of 80 or above, marking them as critical risk. These high scores reflect strong, multi-signal evidence of fraudulent activity rather than minor anomalies. An additional 155,219 entities scored between 60 and 79, classifying them as high risk needing further investigation. The data show that roughly one in three entities in the analyzed set exhibit significant indicators of fraud.

\"\"

The mechanics of modern streaming fraud

Fraud strategies have become more advanced, involving complex, multi-layered techniques that go far beyond basic bot attacks.

\"\"

Multi-dimensional pattern detection

Effective detection requires recognizing these patterns together, since fraud is rarely one-sided. Operators of playlist farms often exhibit temporal anomalies, such as streaming at unusual hours, along with coordinated network activity and metadata inconsistencies.

The CopyrightChains platform utilizes seven specific detection algorithms:

  1. Playlist farm detection: Identifies networks of bot-curated playlists.
  2. Track stuffing analysis: Flags artificially inflated catalogs.
  3. Coordinated network detection: Locates accounts operating in concert.
  4. Fake catalog identification: Detects fabricated artist profiles.
  5. Royalty farming detection: Uncovers systematic royalty manipulation.
  6. Temporal anomaly analysis: Identifies unnatural streaming time patterns.
  7. Label and copyright gap detection: Locates inconsistencies in metadata.

In addition, we have identified 5 other less common detection algorithms that we will not disclose, as they underpin an increasingly sophisticated setup and are directly related to our work on creating a more AI- and search-friendly architecture.

A composite score synthesizes these findings. While a single flag may represent a coincidence, multiple concurrent flags provide a definitive signal of fraudulent activity.

Operationalizing fraud intelligence

Data requires accessibility to drive action.

The CopyrightChains analyst dashboard offers live, interactive access to real-time data, allowing investigators to filter 575,000 entities by risk level, pattern, and type. The system enables drilling down into specific evidence for each score, marking false positives to improve institutional knowledge, and monitoring score changes over time. Authorized stakeholders access this intelligence through a role-based security system.

Economic impact and future deployment

Fraudulent streams directly drain the limited royalty pool, reducing payments to legitimate rights holders. Independent and mid-tier creators, who lack the resources to fight systemic abuse, suffer the most financial damage. By detecting fraud at scale, the platform guarantees royalties go to the content creators who earned them.

Future development will broaden the system beyond the initial scope to include more streaming platforms, shift from batch analysis to real-time monitoring, and integrate with modern rights management systems.

This initial step in building a comprehensive transparency infrastructure is a core issue for our partners.

Technical architecture (public)

The platform applies seven distinct detection algorithms simultaneously across the streaming data graph.

\n\n
Detection patternTarget activity
Playlist farmBot-curated playlist networks
Track stuffingArtificially inflated catalogs
Coordinated networkMulti-account fraud rings
Fake catalogFabricated artist/album profiles
Royalty farmingSystematic royalty manipulation
Temporal anomalyUnnatural streaming time patterns
Label and copyright gapMetadata inconsistencies signaling fraud
\n\n

The system assigns a composite fraud score to each entity, ranging from 0 to 100, by synthesizing signals from all applicable patterns. This allows analysts to review the specific evidentiary data supporting each score.

Current detection metrics

As of February 2026, the platform has generated the following analysis:

\n\n
MetricValue
Total entities flagged575,051
Critical risk (score 80+)22,530
High risk (score 60–79)155,219
Detection patterns running7
Entity types analyzed5
\n\n

Breakdown by entity type:

\n\n
Entity typeCount
Tracks328,676
Albums134,846
Playlists72,321
Artists33,682
Playlist owners5,526
\n\n

The data confirms that fraud permeates the entire ecosystem, affecting individual tracks, albums, and the playlist owners distributing them.

","images":[{"sha256":"e2e7274834bf92e3c73daf50530ddc0720fbeb0fcde47e1e76d64b3ff081997b","url":"https://news.proofprofile.it/content/images/2026/02/fraud-2.jpg"},{"sha256":"0ed13ccb9fb40a96440aba0c4cd24c75c97207e038d23890a6b870fdba3f44d0","url":"https://news.proofprofile.it/content/images/2026/02/screenshot-fraud.copyrightchains.com-2026.02.11-06_46_39-1.png"},{"sha256":"489969a7823e7d1d245c5e703c4c8f7aced4aa6cb3c8a4a8e9752a81bd86cbe4","url":"https://news.proofprofile.it/content/images/2026/02/screenshot-fraud.copyrightchains.com-2026.02.11-06_47_25.png"}],"lexical":{"root":{"children":[{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"NIM has gone beyond merely discussing the problem to actively measuring it by building a fraud-detection engine to analyze it. The data generated offers a clear picture of the scale of the problem.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"alignment":"left","backgroundColor":"grey","buttonColor":"accent","buttonText":"Ask for access","buttonTextColor":"#FFFFFF","buttonUrl":"mailto: info@allnim.com","hasSponsorLabel":false,"imageHeight":null,"imageUrl":"","imageWidth":null,"layout":"minimal","linkColor":"accent","showButton":true,"showDividers":true,"sponsorLabel":"

SPONSORED

","textValue":"

Due to the sensitive nature of our detection algorithms, access to the fraud detection dashboard is limited (fraud.copyrightchains.com)

","type":"call-to-action","version":1,"visibility":{"email":{"memberSegment":"status:free,status:-free"},"web":{"memberSegment":"status:free,status:-free","nonMember":true}}},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Critical risk identification across the ecosystem","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"tag":"h3","type":"extended-heading","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"The system examined 575,051 entities, including tracks, playlists, artists, albums, and playlist owners. Seven fraud detection algorithms were applied simultaneously to this data, producing a risk score ranging from 0 to 100 for each entity.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"The analysis identified 22,530 entities with scores of 80 or above, marking them as critical risk. These high scores reflect strong, multi-signal evidence of fraudulent activity rather than minor anomalies. An additional 155,219 entities scored between 60 and 79, classifying them as high risk needing further investigation. The data show that roughly one in three entities in the analyzed set exhibit significant indicators of fraud.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"alt":"","caption":"","cardWidth":"wide","height":513,"href":"","src":"https://news.proofprofile.it/content/images/2026/02/screenshot-fraud.copyrightchains.com-2026.02.11-06_46_39-1.png","title":"","type":"image","version":1,"width":1396},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"The mechanics of modern streaming fraud","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"tag":"h2","type":"extended-heading","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Fraud strategies have become more advanced, involving complex, multi-layered techniques that go far beyond basic bot attacks.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Playlist farms","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" operate as networks of bot-curated playlists. A single operator creates playlists, generating millions of artificial streams, funneling royalties to specific tracks under their control.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":1,"version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Track stuffing","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" involves flooding the platform with short, auto-generated content. Fraudsters upload thousands of tracks just over the 30-second royalty threshold and utilize bot networks to stream them continuously.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":2,"version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Coordinated networks","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" consist of account clusters behaving with suspicious synchronization, such as following identical playlists or streaming the same tracks simultaneously.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":3,"version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Fake catalogs","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" appear as complete artist profiles but exist solely to capture revenue, often utilizing AI-generated audio or repurposed ambient noise.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":4,"version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"listType":"bullet","start":1,"tag":"ul","type":"list","version":1},{"alt":"","caption":"","cardWidth":"wide","height":990,"href":"","src":"https://news.proofprofile.it/content/images/2026/02/screenshot-fraud.copyrightchains.com-2026.02.11-06_47_25.png","title":"","type":"image","version":1,"width":1040},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Multi-dimensional pattern detection","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"tag":"h3","type":"extended-heading","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Effective detection requires recognizing these patterns together, since fraud is rarely one-sided. Operators of playlist farms often exhibit temporal anomalies, such as streaming at unusual hours, along with coordinated network activity and metadata inconsistencies.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"The CopyrightChains platform utilizes seven specific detection algorithms:","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Playlist farm detection:","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" Identifies networks of bot-curated playlists.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":1,"version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Track stuffing analysis:","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" Flags artificially inflated catalogs.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":2,"version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Coordinated network detection:","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" Locates accounts operating in concert.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":3,"version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Fake catalog identification:","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" Detects fabricated artist profiles.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":4,"version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Royalty farming detection:","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" Uncovers systematic royalty manipulation.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":5,"version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Temporal anomaly analysis:","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" Identifies unnatural streaming time patterns.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":6,"version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Label and copyright gap detection:","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" Locates inconsistencies in metadata.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"listitem","value":7,"version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"listType":"number","start":1,"tag":"ol","type":"list","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"In addition, we have identified 5 other less common detection algorithms that we will not disclose, as they underpin an increasingly sophisticated setup and are directly related to our work on creating a more AI- and search-friendly architecture.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"A composite score synthesizes these findings. While a single flag may represent a coincidence, multiple concurrent flags provide a definitive signal of fraudulent activity.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Operationalizing fraud intelligence","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"tag":"h3","type":"extended-heading","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Data requires accessibility to drive action.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"The CopyrightChains analyst dashboard offers live, interactive access to real-time data, allowing investigators to filter 575,000 entities by risk level, pattern, and type. The system enables drilling down into specific evidence for each score, marking false positives to improve institutional knowledge, and monitoring score changes over time. Authorized stakeholders access this intelligence through a role-based security system.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Economic impact and future deployment","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"tag":"h3","type":"extended-heading","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Fraudulent streams directly drain the limited royalty pool, reducing payments to legitimate rights holders. Independent and mid-tier creators, who lack the resources to fight systemic abuse, suffer the most financial damage. By detecting fraud at scale, the platform guarantees royalties go to the content creators who earned them.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Future development will broaden the system beyond the initial scope to include more streaming platforms, shift from batch analysis to real-time monitoring, and integrate with modern rights management systems.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"This initial step in building a comprehensive transparency infrastructure is a core issue for our partners.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Technical architecture (public)","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"tag":"h2","type":"extended-heading","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"The platform applies ","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"seven distinct detection algorithms","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" simultaneously across the streaming data graph.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"html":"
Detection patternTarget activity
Playlist farmBot-curated playlist networks
Track stuffingArtificially inflated catalogs
Coordinated networkMulti-account fraud rings
Fake catalogFabricated artist/album profiles
Royalty farmingSystematic royalty manipulation
Temporal anomalyUnnatural streaming time patterns
Label and copyright gapMetadata inconsistencies signaling fraud
","type":"html","version":1,"visibility":{"email":{"memberSegment":"status:free,status:-free"},"web":{"memberSegment":"status:free,status:-free","nonMember":true}}},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"The system assigns a ","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"composite fraud score to each entity, ranging from 0 to 100, by","type":"extended-text","version":1},{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":" synthesizing signals from all applicable patterns. This allows analysts to review the specific evidentiary data supporting each score.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Current detection metrics","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"tag":"h3","type":"extended-heading","version":1},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"As of February 2026, the platform has generated the following analysis:","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1},{"html":"
MetricValue
Total entities flagged575,051
Critical risk (score 80+)22,530
High risk (score 60–79)155,219
Detection patterns running7
Entity types analyzed5
","type":"html","version":1,"visibility":{"email":{"memberSegment":"status:free,status:-free"},"web":{"memberSegment":"status:free,status:-free","nonMember":true}}},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":0,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"Breakdown by entity type:","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"tag":"h3","type":"extended-heading","version":1},{"html":"
Entity typeCount
Tracks328,676
Albums134,846
Playlists72,321
Artists33,682
Playlist owners5,526
","type":"html","version":1,"visibility":{"email":{"memberSegment":"status:free,status:-free"},"web":{"memberSegment":"status:free,status:-free","nonMember":true}}},{"children":[{"detail":0,"format":1,"mode":"normal","style":"","text":"The data confirms that fraud permeates the entire ecosystem, affecting individual tracks, albums, and the playlist owners distributing them.","type":"extended-text","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"paragraph","version":1}],"direction":"ltr","format":"","indent":0,"type":"root","version":1}},"post_uuid":"6040f5b2-7b8d-4ff4-b04d-689b773cff3a","previous_content_hash":null,"published_at":"2026-02-11T06:25:25.000Z","site":"news.proofprofile.it","title":"The silence that pays better than a song. Analysis of playlists reveals the scale of streaming fraud.","type":"news-article-snapshot","url":"https://news.proofprofile.it/the-silence-that-pays-better-than-a-song-analysis-of-playlists-reveals-the-scale-of-streaming-fraud/","version":1,"version_published_at":"2026-02-11T06:25:25.000Z"}