Exciting times. Exciting AI times.

And no, I don’t mean the usual balancing act of describing AI as a useful tool for composers, songwriters, lyricists, performers, and…

Exciting times. Exciting AI times.
Text and picture Alfons Karabuda

And no, I don’t mean the usual balancing act of describing AI as a useful tool for composers, songwriters, lyricists, performers, and producers while at the same time being a threat to our creative existence.

It’s exciting because the co-innovation between creators and technology that we should have had in place when building and accepting the streaming service structure is now genuinely happening.

Sure, many in our business still have a silo mentality, believing that if it’s broken, don’t try to fix it — as long as it’s our money and copyright the standard is set for, not theirs.

We have always had a tendency to blame others for the flaws affecting the conditions of our work and income, and we now do the same when it comes to AI. We see it as us versus them, humans versus machines. But why not think of it as man with machine versus man without machine? Let’s face it: Development can be driven by humans and machines, but adoption is driven by people.

Adoption of new technology has always been the weakest point historically, often resulting in inferior technology setting the standard.

Some of the big players in the music industry might see themselves as untouchable and be reluctant to enter a more sustainable and lucrative business model. This will not hinder progress to continue and increase overall value anyway, merely removing a few of the big ones from the equation. Consider BlackBerry, which went from a 20% market share to 0.1% in 2016.

So why am I so optimistic?

- This week, I have used fully functioning tools demonstrating how, with advanced music DNA registration and analysis, we are ready to license our music to AI companies just like any other service using our music. This means we expand the possibilities to monetize music through AI, not reduce them.

- I have seen how we can use AI to identify what AI creates and what is human-made. It can even show the percentage of how much is created by humans, providing a tool for a CMO or other representative to help identify which repertoire to represent in collective management and what is protected under copyright law.

Talking has been important. Now is the time to act.

Exciting times. Exciting AI times.

Evidence

ArticleExciting times. Exciting AI times. (CCN0051)
Archived fromMoved here from news.copyrightchains.com (original address), first published there 2024-06-06 02:18:34 UTC
Registered on CopyrightChainsOriginal CopyrightID 0x4df7b0739960953916d1c8b745aa5ab7103e0b65f4f4de7ad8f3750bd6d65f9a (explorer), registered on news.copyrightchains.com 2025-12-30 11:48:01 UTC. It keeps that CopyrightID and was not registered again here.
Registered text hashSHA-256 0x40ca5542cad0a7c1b2f6634a987405cc7f9db7283e73265d4b697fd0f77c1edf
Snapshot of this copySHA-256 01c99493d6a1161134210f95c0ebe6e28d1b6ced30095747177bea876a635169 · snapshot · OpenTimestamps proof
This copy existed by Bitcoin block975195 (2026-11-09 16:38:44 UTC). A new Bitcoin proof made when the article moved here: it dates this copy, not when the article was written.
Archive recordSHA-256 2d23d71b757ed5dcf891ae47f603ce770b3426ceb05dc17b1c446ead3da2369e · record · OpenTimestamps proof
Archive record existed by Bitcoin block975195 (2026-11-09 16:38:44 UTC)
Check it yourselfverification API · all versions

This shows that this copy of an article moved from news.copyrightchains.com existed in this exact form by the Bitcoin blocks given, and which CopyrightID registered the original there. The Bitcoin blocks date this copy, not the writing or the original registration: the CopyrightID transaction dates the registration. It does not establish that the article is true, who wrote it, or who owns it. CopyrightChains is a permissioned registry operated by the publisher; independent time evidence comes from the Bitcoin anchor.